{"id":107879,"date":"2020-11-09T03:26:39","date_gmt":"2020-11-09T00:26:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/heres-how-many-trump-posts-have-been-flagged-for-misinformation-since-election-day\/"},"modified":"2020-11-09T03:26:39","modified_gmt":"2020-11-09T00:26:39","slug":"heres-how-many-trump-posts-have-been-flagged-for-misinformation-since-election-day","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/heres-how-many-trump-posts-have-been-flagged-for-misinformation-since-election-day\/","title":{"rendered":"#Here’s how many Trump posts have been flagged for misinformation since Election Day"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#Here’s how many Trump posts have been flagged for misinformation since Election Day<\/strong>”<\/p>\n

\n
\"Take<\/source><\/source><\/picture>
\nTake a hint, Donnie.
\n<\/figcaption>
\nImage: bob al-greene \/ mashable\n<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

Donald Trump likes to blame “Big Tech” for having it out for him. In reality, in response to reports that link social media<\/a> to the spread of dangerous misinformation, both Twitter<\/a> and Facebook<\/a> were forced to implement new policies<\/a> around the 2020 election to quell a problem of Trump’s own making.<\/p>\n

And boy, do his feeds \u2014 where practically every other post has been flagged for violating these new policies \u2014 reflect exactly how badly we needed those policies.<\/p>\n

Over the months leading up to the 2020 presidential election, Trump had been making false, completely unsubstantiated claims around widespread voter fraud, as well as accusing the Democrats of rigging or stealing the election with absolutely zero evidence. Concerned that allowing Trump to spread blatant lies that cast doubt on the perfectly legitimate results<\/a> of a democratic election would incite more unrest or even violence in America, those social<\/a> platforms prepared by instituting new policies around flagging disputed claims and misinformation.<\/p>\n

Sure enough, since vote counting began on Election Day (Nov. 3) five days ago, Twitter and Facebook have been forced to flag the president’s posts (including retweets and reposts) for potentially misleading or disputed election claims a total of 34 and 27 times, respectively.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Now, those numbers come with some caveats. For one, they only reflect his posts at the time of this article’s publication on Sunday afternoon, Pacific Time. Also, because of the way Twitter and Facebook have been handling the election misinformation situation differently, we had to very specifically define what we mean by “flagging.”\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Meanwhile, Facebook is labeling posts from *both* Trump and Biden with relatively anodyne messaging about the votes still being counted, but does not app<\/a>ear to have taken enforcement action on any. pic.twitter.com\/nJvBhPB5sr<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Will Oremus\u2019 Total Landscaping (@WillOremus) November 4, 2020<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

As of Nov. 8, Facebook has taken the approach of flagging every post from both Donald Trump and Joe Biden’s page with a note that Joe Biden is the projected winner of the 2020 election (citing Reuters<\/a> and the Associated Press<\/a> as sources).\u00a0<\/p>\n

Since this more general fact-checking tag<\/a> applied to everything, we only counted the Trump posts flagged with the following corrections<\/a>, citing the Bipartisan Policy Center<\/a> as the source:\u00a0<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. “Election officials follow strict rules when it comes to ballot counting, handling and reporting.”<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
  2. “Differences between final results and initial vote counts are due to it taking several days after polls closed to ensure all votes are counted.”<\/p>\n<\/li>\n
  3. \n

    “As expected, election results have taken longer this year. Millions of people across the US voted by mail, and mail ballots take longer to count.”\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  4. \n

    “Both voting in person and voting by mail have a long history of trustworthiness in the US. Voter fraud is extremely rare across voting methods.”<\/p>\n<\/li>\n

  5. \n

    “Observers of the vote counting process are required to act peacefully and lawfully, and not interfere with the process.”<\/p>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Out of the 54 posts Trump has made since vote counting began on Nov. 3, 27 included a pop-up with one of the above pieces of factual information. That means exactly half of the president’s posts were flagged. However, notably, Facebook users are still able to exit out of said pop-up in order to make that flagged information disappear.<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n

    All of Trump\u2019s tweets from the past hour have now been labeled. pic.twitter.com\/1HvJSrUoDl<\/a><\/p>\n

    \u2014 Brian Fung (@b_fung) November 7, 2020<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    Twitter’s policy didn’t include any wholesale fact-checking tags. Instead, they responded only to violations, with some posts merely flagged with a disclaimer: “This claim about election fraud is disputed.“<\/em> Meanwhile, other Trump posts considered to more seriously violate the rules were further hidden behind a warning users need to click on in order to read the tweet, stating that, “Some or all of the content shared in this Tweet is disputed and might be misleading about an election or other civic process.”\u00a0<\/p>\n

    \n

    SEE ALSO: IGTV and Facebook Live are blind spots in Facebook’s election misinformation fight<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    Out of the 80 tweets Trump has posted since vote counting began on Nov. 3, 34 received these flags. In other words, more than 40 percent of the tweets the president has shared since vote counting began have violated the company’s rules around misinformation about the election.<\/p>\n

    If you’re wondering if any of Joe Biden’s posts were flagged on either platforms: No, they were not. Before you think this spells out a conspiracy against Trump, though, take the time to actually read and understand the difference in each candidate’s posts, and why one needs to be handled like a ticking time bomb and the other is acting like an elected official running for President of the United States.<\/p>\n

    \n
    \n
    \n

    Big day on Twitter for Congress\u2019s first QAnon adherent pic.twitter.com\/q5pUUNgHN5<\/a><\/p>\n

    \u2014 Will Oremus\u2019 Total Landscaping (@WillOremus) November 5, 2020<\/a>\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

    In the wee hours of Nov 4., Trump made the reason behind the need for these new social media policies abundantly clear.\u00a0<\/p>\n

    At a press conference, he in essence attempted a coup by declaring himself the victor of an unfinished election \u2014 despite the fact that Joe Biden was in the lead and all legitimately cast votes in key swing states were still days away from being fully counted. \u00a0Biden was later declared the projected winner on Saturday, Nov. 7, only after<\/em> the majority of votes were actually counted.<\/p>\n

    Trump wasn’t the only politician on the 2020 ballot who needed to have their social posts judiciously flagged for misinformation, though. Marjorie Taylor Greene, the QAnon believer from Georgia just elected to Congress, also had a string of tweets that needed to be flagged<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

    So Trump’s keeping good company, I guess.
    \n