{"id":158745,"date":"2021-01-20T13:43:51","date_gmt":"2021-01-20T10:43:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/tether-and-bitfinex-seek-further-30-days-to-produce-critical-trial-documents\/"},"modified":"2021-01-20T13:43:51","modified_gmt":"2021-01-20T10:43:51","slug":"tether-and-bitfinex-seek-further-30-days-to-produce-critical-trial-documents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/tether-and-bitfinex-seek-further-30-days-to-produce-critical-trial-documents\/","title":{"rendered":"# Tether and Bitfinex seek further 30 days to produce critical trial documents"},"content":{"rendered":"

“# Tether and Bitfinex seek further 30 days to produce critical trial documents <\/strong>”
\n<\/p>\n

iFinex Inc \u2014 the parent company of crypto exchange Bitfinex and stablecoin issuer Tether (USDT) \u2014 has written to the New York Supreme Court requesting that its upcoming trial date be pushed back even further.<\/p>\n

According to a filing<\/a> submitted to the New York court system on Jan. 19, the legal counsel for iFinex Inc requested another 30 days to produce the documents demanded by the Office of the Attorney General<\/a> (OAG). <\/p>\n

The document production process was supposed to be completed by Jan. 15 \u2014 a date which itself was an extension on the original deadline of Dec. 16. Legal counsel for the defendant, Charles Michael, said in Tuesday\u2019s court filing that a \u201csubstantial volume\u201d of material had already been handed over to the OAG, but that there remained \u201csupplemental agreed-upon items\u201d that still had to be sourced.<\/p>\n

The filing noted that, in addition to the time it will take to produce the documents in question, extra time will also have to be set aside for the OAG to analyze their importance. The filing states:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe parties will need a few more weeks to produce the supplemental information, for OAG to review the production, and to discuss further among themselves what if any further proceedings may be necessary.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The ongoing legal battle extends back to April 2019, when the New York Attorney General alleged that Bitfinex had attempted to cover up the loss of $850 million of customers\u2019 funds by taking illegal loans from Tether, with which it shares executive leadership. The defendants are also alleged to have operated an illegal securities offering.<\/p>\n

The investigation by the NYAG had previously revealed that no more than 74% of Tether stablecoins were actually backed up by real cash reserves. This hasn\u2019t stopped over $24 billion worth of USDT being issued to date, and the stablecoin is still involved in the largest volume of crypto market spot trading on a daily basis. <\/p>\n

Chief technology<\/a> officer of Bitfinex, Paulo Ardoini, recently took to his Twitter<\/a> account to remind observers that Tether was registered and regulated under the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, and that any suggestion that USDT represented a security was just an example of fear, doubt and uncertainty, or FUD.<\/p>\n

\n

Reminder: #Tether<\/a> is registered and regulated under FinCEN as all the centralised competitors. Strict KYC\/AML is app<\/a>lied to all Tether direct users, as the other main issuers are doing. Less regulated is just FUD. Ask yourself who benefits from spreading such misinformation? https:\/\/t.co\/0izlgpJ75r<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2014 Paolo Ardoino (@paoloardoino) December 30, 2020<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n