{"id":185224,"date":"2021-02-22T03:32:31","date_gmt":"2021-02-22T00:32:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/bidens-equality-act-is-a-danger-to-womens-and-conscience-rights\/"},"modified":"2021-02-22T03:32:31","modified_gmt":"2021-02-22T00:32:31","slug":"bidens-equality-act-is-a-danger-to-womens-and-conscience-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/bidens-equality-act-is-a-danger-to-womens-and-conscience-rights\/","title":{"rendered":"#Biden\u2019s Equality Act is a danger to women\u2019s and conscience rights"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#Biden\u2019s Equality Act is a danger to women\u2019s and conscience<\/a> rights<\/strong>”
\n<\/p>\n

\n

President Biden has promised to unify the nation. But candidate Joe Biden also made campaign promises to the radical wing of his party that would widen our social<\/a> divides. Guess which promises are being honored.<\/p>\n

Witness the so-called Equality Act, which candidate Biden vowed to make a priority and which is set to be voted on by the House this week. What\u2019s the Equality Act? And who could be against equality? Don\u2019t let the name fool you.<\/p>\n

The act \u201cupdates\u201d the law Congress passed primarily to combat \u00adracism, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and adds sexual orientation and gender identity as protected classes akin to race. So if you have any reservations about gender ideology \u2014 as even many progressives do; just ask J.K. Rowling \u2014 you\u2019d now be the legal equivalent of Bull Connor.<\/p>\n

Rather than finding common-sense, narrowly tailored ways to shield LGBT-identifying Americans from truly unjust discrimination, the bill would act as a sword \u2014 to persecute those who don\u2019t embrace newfangled gender ideologies. It would vitiate a sex binary that is quite literally written into our genetic code and is fundamental to many of our laws, not least laws protecting the equality, safety and privacy of women.<\/p>\n

The Equality Act would sacrifice the hard-won rights of women, while privileging men who identify as women. If it \u00adbecomes law, such men would have a right to spend the night in battered-women\u2019s shelters, disrobe in women\u2019s locker rooms and compete on women\u2019s sports teams \u2014 even at K-12 schools.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t believe me? Here\u2019s the text: \u201cAn individual shall not be denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual\u2019s gender identity.\u201d So you can keep separate facilities for men and women, but you have to redefine what men and women are. Likewise, you can \u00adreserve certain jobs only for men or women \u2014 think TSA agents doing pat-downs \u2014 but you have to let a man who identifies as a woman do strip<\/a> searches on women.<\/p>\n

The act would also massively expand the government\u2019s regulatory reach. The Civil Rights Act, it seems, is too narrow for today\u2019s Democrats. The Equality Act would coerce \u201cany establishment that provides a good, service, or program, including a store, shopping center, online retailer or service provider, salon, bank, gas station, food bank, service or care center, shelter, travel agency or funeral parlor, or establishment that provides health care, accounting or legal services,\u201d along with any organization that receives any federal funding.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s more or less everyone and everything.<\/p>\n

Religious institutions are very much included. Under the Equality Act, religious schools, adoption agencies and other charities would face federal sanction for upholding the teachings of mainstream biology and the Bible, modern \u00adgenetics and Genesis, when it comes to sex and marriage.<\/p>\n

They\u2019ll be at risk, because the Equality Act takes our laws on \u00adracial equality and adds highly \u00adideological concepts about sex and gender. But most laws on racism included no religious-liberty protections \u2014 unlike, for example Title IX, which includes robust protections for faith-based schools.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Outrageously, the Equality Act explicitly exempts itself from the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. Pope Francis would be treated as the legal equivalent of a Jim Crow segregationist.\u00a0<\/p>\n

It gets worse. Medical doctors, secular and religious, whose \u00adexpert judgment is that sex-reassignment procedures are misguided would now run afoul of our civil-rights laws. If you perform a mastectomy in the case of breast cancer, you will have to perform one on the teenage girl identifying as a boy. All in the name of equality. And no one knows what is required under the act to avoid committing \u201cdiscrimination\u201d in the case of \u201cnonbinary\u201d gender identities.<\/p>\n

The icing on the cake? The act treats any refusal to offer abortion as \u201cpregnancy\u201d discrimination. Decades of conscience protections against abortion extremism at the federal, state and local levels would be undermined.<\/p>\n

These threats to our society are just a few reasons why the Orwellian Equality Act should be rejected. To heal and unify the nation on LGBT issues, we must reject unjust discrimination without treating reasonable judgments as discriminatory.<\/p>\n

Ryan T. Anderson is president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center.<\/em><\/p>\n

Twitter: @RyanTAnd<\/a><\/em>\n <\/div>\n