{"id":195373,"date":"2021-03-06T02:07:02","date_gmt":"2021-03-05T23:07:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/merrick-garlands-big-tech-non-answers-grounds-to-think-twice-on-him\/"},"modified":"2021-03-06T02:07:02","modified_gmt":"2021-03-05T23:07:02","slug":"merrick-garlands-big-tech-non-answers-grounds-to-think-twice-on-him","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/merrick-garlands-big-tech-non-answers-grounds-to-think-twice-on-him\/","title":{"rendered":"#Merrick Garland&#8217;s Big Tech non-answers grounds to think twice on him"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;<strong>#Merrick Garland&#8217;s Big Tech non-answers grounds to think twice on him<\/strong>&#8221;<br \/>\n<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/03\/US-SENATE_JUSTICE-GARLAND.jpg?quality=90&amp;strip=all\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>On Monday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to confirm President Biden\u2019s attorney <a href=\"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/category\/general\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"3\" title=\"General\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">general<\/a> nominee, Merrick Garland. The full Senate should think twice before doing the same.<\/p>\n<p>Throughout his two-day confirmation hearing, Democrats and Republicans questioned Judge Garland extensively on his plans to tame and regulate the Big Tech behemoths.\u00a0The bipartisan focus was understandable: While the Biden administration has faced wide scrutiny for its proximity to Big Tech and <a href=\"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/category\/download-scripts-themes-apps\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"9\" title=\"Download Scripts &amp; Themes &amp; Apps\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">app<\/a>ointments of former <a href=\"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/category\/social-mediaa\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"1\" title=\"Social Media\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Facebook<\/a> and Google leaders, its choices for the Justice Department warrant no less concern.<\/p>\n<p>Vanita Gupta, Biden\u2019s nominee for associate attorney general, for example, has encouraged Facebook censorship. Last summer, she called it \u201cincomprehensible\u201d that the social media giant allowed some of then-President Donald Trump\u2019s posts to remain up. As an activist, Kristen Clarke, Biden\u2019s pick to head the department\u2019s Civil Rights Division,\u00a0was \u201cinstrumental\u201d in getting Facebook to ban users from its platform. <\/p>\n<p>With radicals such as these in place at DOJ, it\u2019s clear that if Judge Garland isn\u2019t serious about confronting Big Tech, his staff will take charge, and not in a pleasant way. And yet, not once in his two days of questioning did he call Big Tech\u2019s assault on competition and free speech a problem. He could only mouth vague platitudes and nebulous talking points, casting significant doubt on his commitment to bringing justice and accountability to these digital monopolies.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s easy to <em>claim<\/em> you take antitrust enforcement seriously while looking the other way or believing no government action against Big Tech is necessary. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) made this point when he asked Garland whether Big Tech\u2019s political donations to Biden could influence a Garland-run DOJ\u2019s operations. The judge ominously responded, \u201cI don\u2019t expect to talk to any donors. I have no conflicts. I don\u2019t own any Google stock.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Garland\u2019s ability to dodge, duck and weave would make Muhammad Ali proud. Although he insists he doesn\u2019t have any personal Big Tech conflicts, he refused to explain how or if an Attorney General Garland would ensure possible Biden administration\u2019s conflicts don\u2019t impact Justice\u2019s proceedings, which is supposed to operate independently of the executive branch.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps Garland couldn\u2019t answer because he knows how unpleasant the truth would be to Congress and the American public. Congress can\u2019t afford to rule out Garland deference to the White House, especially given how he conceded he might follow the emerging administration-wide trend of naming Big Tech allies to key posts.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The importance of isolating the Department of Justice from Big Tech\u2019s political power cannot be overstated. After all, it\u2019s the independence of the DOJ from the executive branch that many believe\u00a0initiated this whole movement against\u00a0Big Tech in the first place.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Despite the administration\u2019s close ties to Silicon Valley, the Obama Justice Department in 2015 filed a brief against Google, arguing that the firm engaged in significant intellectual property theft in creating Android. Thanks in part to a similar friend-of-the-court brief filed by the Trump DOJ, lawyers now consider the action to be the copyright case of the century\u00a0because it could help stop what appears to be one of Big Tech\u2019s primary means of monopolizing the digital marketplace \u2014\u00a0intellectual-property theft.<\/p>\n<p>Given Big Tech\u2019s clout with the Obama White House, would this case have gotten to this pivotal point without an independent DOJ? Perhaps not. Nevertheless, the Senate is now poised to vote on an attorney general nominee who declined to even say whether potential White House tech conflicts will influence his behavior.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The judge\u2019s silence and indirectness should tell Congress everything it needs to know about where he stands: Lack of candor is strong grounds for suspicion, especially regarding a matter as important as Big Tech\u2019s monopolistic power to censor voices it doesn\u2019t like and dictate the terms of public debate.<\/p>\n<p>At this pivotal moment, America simply can\u2019t afford to hand its justice system over to someone who refuses to pledge his full independence and support for holding these behemoths accountable. If Garland doesn\u2019t provide clearer answers soon \u2014 either in person or in writing \u2014\u00a0members should think twice before confirming him. Accountability should always trump political expediency.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><em>Harmeet K. Dhillon is a civil-rights lawyer and the CEO of the Center for American Liberty.<\/em>\n            <\/div>\n<blockquote><p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">If you liked the article, do not forget to share it with your friends. Follow us on\u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><a style=\"color: #ff0000;\" href=\"https:\/\/news.google.com\/publications\/CAAqBwgKMLG0nwswvr63Aw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Google News<\/a><\/span>\u00a0too, click on the star and choose us from your favorites.<\/span><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">For forums sites go to <span style=\"color: #ff9900;\"><a style=\"color: #ff9900;\" href=\"https:\/\/forum.buradabiliyorum.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Forum.BuradaBiliyorum.Com<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>If you want to read more <a href=\"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/category\/news\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"2\" title=\"News\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">News<\/a> articles, you can visit our <span style=\"color: #ff9900;\"><a style=\"color: #ff9900;\" href=\"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">News category.<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\"><a style=\"color: #ff9900;\" href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2021\/03\/05\/merrick-garlands-big-tech-non-answers-grounds-to-think-twice-on-him\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;#Merrick Garland&#8217;s Big Tech non-answers grounds to think twice on him&#8221; On Monday, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted to confirm President Biden\u2019s attorney general nominee, Merrick Garland. The full Senate should think twice before doing the same. Throughout his two-day confirmation hearing, Democrats and Republicans questioned Judge Garland extensively on his plans to tame and&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":195374,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/nypost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2021\/03\/US-SENATE_JUSTICE-GARLAND.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1200","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[70897],"tags":[96305,32128,71391,4974,26293,991,4976,4965],"class_list":["post-195373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-3-5-21","tag-censorship","tag-department-of-justice","tag-facebook","tag-google","tag-joe-biden","tag-social-media","tag-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195373\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/195374"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}