{"id":228785,"date":"2021-04-16T21:35:58","date_gmt":"2021-04-16T18:35:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/how-a-theoretical-mouse-could-crack-the-stock-market\/"},"modified":"2021-04-16T21:35:58","modified_gmt":"2021-04-16T18:35:58","slug":"how-a-theoretical-mouse-could-crack-the-stock-market","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/how-a-theoretical-mouse-could-crack-the-stock-market\/","title":{"rendered":"#How a theoretical mouse could crack the stock market"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#How a theoretical mouse could crack the stock market<\/strong>”
\n<\/p>\n

A team of physicists at Emory University recently published research<\/a> indicating they\u2019d successfully managed to reduce a mouse\u2019s brain activity to a simple predictive model. This could be a breakthrough for\u00a0artificial neural networks. You know: robot brains.<\/p>\n

Let there be mice:<\/strong> Scientists can do miraculous things with mice such as grow a human ear<\/a> on one\u2019s back or control one via computer mouse<\/a>. But this is the first time we\u2019ve heard of researchers using machine learning techniques to grow a theoretical mouse brain.<\/p>\n

Per a press release<\/a> from Emory University:<\/p>\n

The dynamics of the neural activity of a mouse brain behave in a peculiar, unexpected way that can be theoretically modeled without any fine tuning.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

In other words:<\/strong> We can observe a mouse\u2019s brain activity in real-time, but there are simply too many neuronal interactions for us to measure and quantify each and every one \u2013 even with AI. So the scientists are using the equivalent of a math trick to make things simpler.<\/p>\n

How\u2019s it work?<\/strong> The research is based on a theory of criticality in neural networks. Basically, all the neurons in your brain exist in an equilibrium between chaos and order. They don\u2019t all do the same thing, but they also aren\u2019t bouncing around randomly.<\/p>\n

The researchers believe the brain operates in this balance in much the same way other state-transitioning systems do. Water, for example, can change from gas to liquid to solid. And, at some point during each transition, it achieves a\u00a0criticality where its molecules are in either both states or neither.<\/p>\n

[Read:\u00a0The biggest tech trends of 2021, according to 3 founders]<\/em><\/p>\n

The researchers hypothesized that brains, organic neural networks, function under the same hypothetical balance state. So, they ran a bunch of tests on mice as they navigated mazes in order to establish a database of brain data.<\/p>\n

Next, the team went to work developing a working, simplified model that could predict neuron interactions using the experimental data as a target. According to their research paper, their model is accurate to within a few percentage points.<\/p>\n

What\u2019s it mean?<\/strong> This is early work but, there\u2019s a reason why scientists use mice brains for this kind of research: because they\u2019re not so different from us. If you can reduce what goes on in a mouse\u2019s head to a working AI model, then it\u2019s likely you can eventually scale that to human-brain levels.<\/p>\n

On the conservative side of things, this could lead to much more robust deep learning solutions. Our current neural networks are a pale attempt to imitate what nature does with ease. But the Emory team\u2019s mouse models could represent a turning point in robustness, especially in areas where a model is likely to be affected by outside factors.<\/p>\n

This could, potentially, include stronger AI inferences where diversity is concerned and increased resilience against bias. And other predictive systems could benefit as well, such as stock market prediction algorithms and financial tracking models. It\u2019s possible this could even increase our ability to predict weather patterns over long periods of time.<\/p>\n

Quick take:<\/strong> This is brilliant, but it\u2019s actual usefulness remains to be seen. Ironically, the tech and AI industries are also at a weird, unpredictable point of criticality where brute-force hardware solutions and elegant software shortcuts are starting to pull away from each other.<\/p>\n

Still, if we take a highly optimistic view, this could also be the start of something amazing such as artificial general<\/a> intelligence (AGI) \u2013 machines that actually think. No matter how we arrive at AGI, it\u2019s likely we\u2019ll need to begin with models capable of imitating nature\u2019s organic neural nets as closely as possible. You got to start somewhere.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n