{"id":259041,"date":"2021-05-25T19:32:30","date_gmt":"2021-05-25T16:32:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/scientific-software-quality-not-always-good\/"},"modified":"2021-05-25T19:32:30","modified_gmt":"2021-05-25T16:32:30","slug":"scientific-software-quality-not-always-good","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/scientific-software-quality-not-always-good\/","title":{"rendered":"#Scientific software: Quality not always good"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#Scientific software: Quality not always good<\/strong>”<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"Scientific
\n Specialized software is used in almost all scientific fields, but its quality is not always good. (Photo: Markus Breig, KIT). Credit: Markus Breig, KIT
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Computational tools are indispensable in almost all scientific disciplines. Especially in cases where large amounts of research data are generated and need to be quickly processed, reliable, carefully developed software is crucial for analyzing and correctly interpreting such data. Nevertheless, scientific software can have quality quality deficiencies. To evaluate software quality in an automated way, computer scientists at Karlsruhe Institute of Technology<\/a> (KIT) and Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies (HITS) have designed the SoftWipe tool.<\/p>\n

“Adherence to coding standards is rarely considered in scientific software, although it can even lead to incorrect scientific results,” says Professor Alexandros Stamatakis, who works both at HITS and at the Institute of Theoretical Informatics (ITI) of KIT. The open-source SoftWipe software tool provides a fast, reliable, and cost-effective app<\/a>roach to addressing this problem by automatically assessing adherence to software development standards. Besides designing the above-mentioned tool, the computer scientists benchmarked 48 scientific software tools from different research areas, to assess to which degree they met coding standards.<\/p>\n

“SoftWipe can also be used in the review process of scientific software and support the software selection process,” adds Adrian Zapletal. The Master’s student and his fellow student Dimitri H\u00f6hler have substantially contributed to the development of SoftWipe. To select assessment criteria, they relied on existing standards that are used in safety-critical environments, such as at NASA or CERN.<\/p>\n

“Our research revealed enormous discrepancies in software quality,” says co-author Professor Carsten Sinz of ITI. Many programs, such as covid-sim, which is used in the UK for mathematical modeling of the COVID-19 disease, had a very low quality score and thus performed poorly in the ranking. The researchers recommend using programs such as SoftWipe by default in the selection and review process of software for scientific purposes.<\/p>\n

How Does SoftWipe Work?<\/b><\/p>\n

SoftWipe is a pipeline written in the Python3 programming language that uses several available static and dynamic code analyzers (most of them are freely available) in order to assess the code quality of software written in C\/C++. In this process, SoftWipe compiles the software and then executes it so that programming errors can be detected during execution. Based on the output of the code analysis tools used, SoftWipe calculates a quality score between 0 (poor) and 10 (excellent) to compute an overall final score.\n <\/p>\n\n

\n

Human and organizational factors influence software quality<\/a>\n <\/div>\n

\n
\n Provided by
\n Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
\n
\n <\/svg><\/a><\/p><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Citation<\/strong>:
\n Scientific software: Quality not always good (2021, May 25)
\n retrieved 25 May 2021
\n from https:\/\/techxplore.com\/news<\/a>\/2021-05-scientific-software-quality-good.html<\/p>\n

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
\n part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n