{"id":267664,"date":"2021-06-05T16:21:41","date_gmt":"2021-06-05T13:21:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/how-google-exploits-the-sick-and-vulnerable-for-a-profit\/"},"modified":"2021-06-05T16:21:41","modified_gmt":"2021-06-05T13:21:41","slug":"how-google-exploits-the-sick-and-vulnerable-for-a-profit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/how-google-exploits-the-sick-and-vulnerable-for-a-profit\/","title":{"rendered":"#How Google exploits the sick and vulnerable for a profit"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#How Google exploits the sick and vulnerable for a profit<\/strong>”<\/p>\n

\n

In 2019, Google embarked on a mysterious-sounding venture.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Called Project Nightingale and carried out in secret, the tech giant teamed up with St. Louis-based Ascension, one of the largest private health-care companies in the country. Google was granted complete access to 50 million patients\u2019 names, lab results, diagnoses and hospitalization records, as well as their home addresses and places of employment. Even more worryingly, at no time<\/a> did Ascension or Google make an attempt to inform the patients or ask for their consent.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Despite patient privacy concerns, this partnership has only grown with Google boosting <\/a>its electronic health-record search tool, likely resulting in the accumulation of even more patient data.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Now, hungry for even more medical data, Google has signed a multiyear deal with HCA, an American for-profit operator of medical facilities with 2,000 health-care sites across 21 different states. The agreement will give Google access to millions more patient records \u2014 enabling its advertisers to specifically target<\/a> even victims of sexual abuse<\/a> as well as those struggling with severe eating disorders<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Google has said it will use the sensitive data to develop health-care algorithms that it could hand off to HCA to test on its own. \u201cWe want to push the boundaries of what the clinician can do in real time with data,\u201d Chris Sakalosky, managing director of healthcare and life science<\/a>s at Google Cloud, told The Wall Street Journal<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"In
In 2019, Google brokered a deal with Ascension and gained access to 50 million patient names, lab results, diagnoses and hospital records.<\/figcaption>
Getty Images (2)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

But the recent HCA deal is almost a carbon copy of the one struck with Ascension \u2014 except it\u2019s even bigger. While Ascension has 165,000 employees and 151 hospitals, HCA boasts 280,000 staff and 186 hospitals. Considering Google earns more than 80\u2009percent<\/a> of its revenue from targeted ads, the monetization of medical records is just another step in its inexorable march toward data domination.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Yet again, one of the wealthiest companies in the world has gained access to highly personal medical data without the consent of patients. Executives at Google claim to care about your privacy, but the reality paints a very different picture.\u00a0<\/p>\n

According to a Consumer Watchdog report<\/a>, Google collects information without people\u2019s knowledge or consent. And the company currently faces a suit<\/a> in California, which claims it collects and breaks data into categories like sexuality, ethnicity, religion, health conditions, etc., which are then \u201cbroadcast to hundreds of bidders,\u201d with the highest bidder \u201cwinning the auction.\u201d<\/p>\n

The accumulation of data pays handsomely: Google\u2019s profits more than doubled<\/a> last quarter.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Experts are now sounding alarm bells about the new HCA venture. The idea of Google selling patients\u2019 data is not beyond the realm of possibility, argues<\/a> Arthur Kaplan, professor of ethics at NYU\u2019s Grossman School of Medicine. After all, this is the very same company that, just a few years ago, removed the \u201cdon\u2019t be evil\u201d clause from its code of conduct.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Also, if Google is going to use highly sensitive data to generate profits, shouldn\u2019t the affected people at least receive proper compensation?\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"Google
Google exec Chris Sakalosky (right) says the tech giant will use HCA patient data to create health-care algorithms \u2014 but really, this is about profit.<\/figcaption>
Alamy; LinkedIn<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Last year, researchers at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business and Northwestern University\u2019s Kellogg School of Management asked<\/a> Americans if they were willing to share their health data with Big Tech companies. Unsurprisingly, 90 percent of respondents said no.\u00a0<\/p>\n

How much, they asked, was the average person willing to accept in exchange for their data? The answer was $100,000. Multiply that figure by 50 million (the number of peoples\u2019 records accessed in 2019) and you get $5 trillion. Enough to end<\/a> the $1-trillion-worth Google as we know it, five times over.\u00a0<\/p>\n

Sadly, the idea of each patient being compensated doesn\u2019t seem likely. So what, if anything, can be done?\u00a0<\/p>\n

According to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA<\/a>), patients have a say in how their health information is handled. If a patient requests that their information not be shared with third parties without their consent, then, according to HIPAA guidelines, this request, under law, must be respected.\u00a0<\/p>\n

If you happ<\/a>en to be a HCA patient and are concerned by what you have read, the company\u2019s ethics line number is 1-800-455-1996. Why not give a call and make sure that your data is not being abused? You might not receive any compensation, but you most certainly deserve to have your questions answered.\u00a0<\/p>\n

John Mac Ghlionn is a researcher and essayist. His work has been published by The South China Morning Post, Sydney Morning Herald, and Townhall. Twitter<\/a>: @ghlionn\u00a0<\/a><\/em>\n <\/div>\n