{"id":310832,"date":"2021-07-29T06:27:41","date_gmt":"2021-07-29T03:27:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/blockcrushr-drops-lawsuit-accusing-consensys-of-stealing-its-ip\/"},"modified":"2021-07-29T06:27:41","modified_gmt":"2021-07-29T03:27:41","slug":"blockcrushr-drops-lawsuit-accusing-consensys-of-stealing-its-ip","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/blockcrushr-drops-lawsuit-accusing-consensys-of-stealing-its-ip\/","title":{"rendered":"# BlockCrushr drops lawsuit accusing ConsenSys of stealing its IP"},"content":{"rendered":"

“# BlockCrushr drops lawsuit accusing ConsenSys of stealing its IP <\/strong>”
\n<\/p>\n

Canadian blockchain startup BlockCrushr has agreed to drop an intellectual property (IP) lawsuit against early backer, Ethereum-focused software engineering firm, ConsenSys.<\/p>\n

The two firms filed a joint agreement to dismiss the case on July 27, with the deal\u2019s terms prohibiting BlockCrushr from attempting to pursue the matter in future.<\/p>\n

ConsenSys has characterized the agreement as a victory for its position, stating: \u201cBlockCrushr has dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice after review of the evidence provided in discovery established that BlockCrushr’s claims were entirely without merit.\u201d<\/p>\n

ConsenSys\u2019 lead counsel, Tibor Nagy, added:<\/p>\n

\u201cThis is an important and complete victory for ConsenSys and illustrates the value of aggressively combating meritless claims.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Filed in July 2020, the complaint claimed ConsenSys launched its \u201cDaisy Payments\u201d recurring payments platform the day before BlockCrushr had planned to bring its own product to market in June 2019.<\/p>\n

BlockCrushr had received a $100,000 investment from ConsenSys and was admitted into its Tachyon accelerator program. The startup alleged that ConsenSys used trade secrets gleaned through the program to front-run its own product to market before BlockCrushr.<\/p>\n

BlockCrushr claimed that \u201cevery aspect of its marketing, financial, technical and regulatory strategy\u201d was shared with ConsenSys during the Tachyon program, including \u201cthe source code and proprietary technical solution to its recurring payments platform.\u201d<\/p>\n

While IP enforcement has been seen as antithetical to crypto\u2019s core ethos of decentralized open-source development, intellectual property matters have emerged as an increasingly hot issue.<\/p>\n

In June, major decentralized finance protocol Curve saw a proposal posted to its governance forums advocating that it should move to protect its software license and redistribute profits from IP enforcement to tokenholders.<\/p>\n

In addition to protecting its position in the market, the post\u2019s author asserted IP enforcement will benefit Curve by reducing competition for bug bounty payments and employee recruitment pertinent to its code.<\/p>\n

In launching its highly anticipated v3 iteration, leading decentralized exchange Uniswap introduced a \u201cbusiness source license\u201d into its code to protect against the unauthorized commercial use of its code \u201cfor up to two years.\u201d The move was intended to prevent clones from app<\/a>earing, after SushiSwap and other rival DEXes forked its v2 code and launching vampire attacks designed to siphon away Uniswap\u2019s liquidity during the DeFi summer of 2020.<\/p>\n

Attempts by the notorious self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig Wright, to prevent websites from hosting the Bitcoin Whitepaper have attracted widespread pushback from the crypto community. Wright has also embarked on a campaign to secure as many patents as he can.<\/p>\n

In April, the Square-led Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA) launched<\/a> a lawsuit requesting the U.K High Court to declare that Craig Wright does not have copyright ownership over the Bitcoin Whitepaper.<\/p>\n