{"id":344990,"date":"2021-09-27T20:41:32","date_gmt":"2021-09-27T17:41:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/facebook-delays-instagram-kids-app-following-bombshell-leak-review-geek\/"},"modified":"2021-09-27T20:41:32","modified_gmt":"2021-09-27T17:41:32","slug":"facebook-delays-instagram-kids-app-following-bombshell-leak-review-geek","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/facebook-delays-instagram-kids-app-following-bombshell-leak-review-geek\/","title":{"rendered":"#Facebook Delays Instagram Kids App Following Bombshell Leak \u2013 Review Geek"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#Facebook<\/a> Delays Instagram Kids App<\/a> Following Bombshell Leak \u2013 Review Geek”<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n
\"Instagram
Instagram<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Of all the anxiety-inducing products that Facebook has announced over the past year, Instagram Kids has received the most pushback. Families just aren\u2019t comfortable letting kids 13 and younger on social media, despite Facebook\u2019s bizarre insistence that Instagram is good for kids<\/a>. Now, as Facebook deals with a bombshell leak, it\u2019s putting Instagram Kids on the back burner.<\/p>\n

We\u2019ve spent the last few decades grappling with TV\u2019s negative impact on body image, but social media could be much more harmful to our children. Platforms like Instagram and TikTok provide endless opportunities for kids to compare themselves with adult influencers, who are often promoted by app moderators for fitting beauty standards<\/a>. And even if kids are only on social media to talk with friends, they may encounter a barrage of AR filters<\/a> that \u201cbeautify\u201d the shape, color, and texture of their face.<\/p>\n

Still, we were shocked when the Wall Street Journal<\/em><\/a> published internal Facebook data linking Instagram use to body image issues in teenage girls. Facebook\u2019s research shows that Instagram makes \u201cbody image issues worse for one in three teen girls,\u201d and that Instagram is a \u201ctoxic\u201d force in children\u2019s lives.<\/p>\n

Not only that, but \u201cteens blame Instagram for increases in the rate of anxiety and depression.\u201d And Facebook did not push teens to give these answers\u2014\u201cThis reaction was unprompted and consistent across all groups,\u201d the company states in leaked slideshows regarding the issue.<\/p>\n

Facebook responded to the Wall Street Journal\u2019s<\/em> leaked report in a blog post<\/a> yesterday, September 26th. The post is repetitive and rambling, but it centers around one claim\u2014\u201cInstagram helps [teens] when they are struggling with the kinds of hard moments and issues teenagers have always faced.\u201d<\/p>\n

Facebook says that Instagram helps teenage girls overcome \u201cloneliness, anxiety, sadness and eating issues,\u201d and that the Wall Street Journal<\/em> cherry-picked its evidence from a 12-page to suggest that Instagram creates body image issues in kids. We can\u2019t verify this claim, as Facebook has not released its 12-page slideshow to the public. (Though this slideshow has been submitted to the Senate Commerce Subcommittee for a hearing on Thursday, August 2nd.)<\/p>\n

Just one day after publishing its defensive blog post, Facebook says it\u2019s pausing development<\/a> of Instagram Kids. The company will focus on optional parental supervision tools for teenagers in the meantime. Still, Facebook says \u201cwe believe building Instagram Kids is the right thing to do.\u201d<\/p>\n

We will probably learn about Facebook\u2019s internal research on Thursday, when the company is set to attend a Senate Commerce Subcommittee hearing<\/a> on the subject. In the meantime, I suggest reading the Journal\u2019s<\/em> new Facebook Files series<\/a>, which documents how the company gives preferential treatment<\/a> to high-profile users, encourages anger<\/a> on its platform, and ignores employee concerns<\/a> when lives are at stake.<\/p>\n

Source: WSJ<\/a>, Facebook<\/a>
<\/small>\n<\/div>\n