{"id":48076,"date":"2020-08-17T16:49:00","date_gmt":"2020-08-17T13:49:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/we-composted-biodegradable-balloons-heres-what-we-found-after-16-weeks\/"},"modified":"2020-08-17T16:49:00","modified_gmt":"2020-08-17T13:49:00","slug":"we-composted-biodegradable-balloons-heres-what-we-found-after-16-weeks","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/we-composted-biodegradable-balloons-heres-what-we-found-after-16-weeks\/","title":{"rendered":"#We composted ‘biodegradable’ balloons. Here’s what we found after 16 weeks"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#We composted ‘biodegradable’ balloons. Here’s what we found after 16 weeks<\/strong>”<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\"We<\/img>
\n \u2018Biodegradable\u2019 balloons after 16 weeks in freshwater. Credit: Jesse Benjamin, Author provided
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

After 16 weeks in an industrial compost heap, we unearthed blue and white balloons and found them totally unscathed. The knots we spent hours painstakingly tying by hand more than four months ago were still attached, and sparkly blue balloons still glinted in the sun.<\/p>\n

\n <\/section>\n

These balloons originally came from packages that advertised them as “100% biodegradable,” with the manufacturers assuring they were made of “100% natural latex rubber.” The implication is that these balloons would have no trouble breaking down in the environment. <\/p>\n

This app<\/a>eals to eco-conscious consumers, but really just fuels corporate greenwashing\u2014unsubstantiated claims of environmentally friendly and safe products.
\nHolding perfectly intact balloons in our hands after four months in industrial compost, we had cause to question these claims, and ran experiments.
\nWhat’s the problem?<\/b>
\nThis problem is two-fold. First, balloons are additional plastic waste in the environment. They are lightweight and can travel<\/a> on air currents far from the point of release. For example, one 2005 study found a balloon traveled more than 200 kilometers.
\nWhen they pop, they float back to the earth’s surface and land in, for example, the ocean or the desert, and wash up on beaches where animals can eat them, from sea turtles and seabirds to desert tortoises. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"We<\/img>
\n Not much changed after 14 weeks. Credit: Morgan Gilmour, Author provided
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

The stretchiness of balloons means they can get stuck in animals’ digestive tracts, which will cause choking, blockage, decreased nutrient absorption and effectively starve the animal.<\/p>\n

Second, what most consumers don’t realize, is that to shape milky natural rubber latex sap into the product we know as a balloon, many additional chemicals need to be added to the latex.
\nThese chemicals include antioxidants and anti-fogging (to counteract that cloudy look balloons can get), plasticisers (to make it more flexible), preservatives (to enable the balloon to sit in warehouses and store shelves for months), flame retardants, fragrance and, of course, dyes and pigments.
\nEven more chemicals have to be used to make the additives “stick” to the latex and to stick to each other, enabling them to work in tandem to create a product we expect to use for about 24 hours. So, the balloons can’t be “100% natural rubber latex.”
\nAnd yet, despite substantial evidence of harm and the presence of these chemicals, balloon littering persists. Balloon releases are common, with only some regional regulations in place, such as in New South Wales and the Sunshine Coast. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"We<\/img>
\n We tested the claims of the balloon industry. Credit: Dahlia Foo, Author provided
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Lying for decades<\/b>
\nWhile some factions of the balloon industry denounce balloon releases, these claims are only recent.
\nFor decades, the industry relied on one industry-funded study from 1989 which claimed that after six short weeks, balloons degraded “at about the same rate as oak tree leaves” and there was no way balloons were a threat to wildlife.
\nThat study was not peer-reviewed, its methods are unclear and not repeatable, and the results are based on only six balloons.
\nBecause balloons are frequently reported to be at sea, ingested by wild animals and washed up on beaches, it’s clear they’re not breaking down in only six weeks. Anecdotal studies have tested this to varying degrees, confirming balloons don’t break down.
\nOnly one peer-reviewed scientific study has quantified balloon degradation, and that also occurred in 1989\u2014the same year as the industry study. They tested elasticity for up to one year, which means the balloons were intact for that whole time.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"We<\/img>
\n The author sampling latex balloons. Credit: Jesse Benjamin, Author provided
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

We wanted to know: has anything changed since 1989? And why aren’t there more studies testing balloon degradation, given the passion behind the balloon issue?
\nSo, we set out to quantify exactly how long latex balloons would take to break down. And we asked if balloons degraded differently in different parts of the environment.
\nOur experiment tested their claims<\/b>
\nIndustrial composting standards require that the material completely disintegrates after 12 weeks and that the product is not distinguishable from the surrounding soil.
\nWe designed an experiment: after exposing balloons to six hours of sunlight (to simulate typical use, for example, at an outdoor party), we put blue and white balloons in industrial compost, and in saltwater and freshwater tanks.
\nWe allowed for aeration to simulate natural conditions, but otherwise, we left the balloons alone. Every two weeks, we randomly removed 40 balloons from each treatment. We photographed them to document degradation. Then we tested them. <\/p>\n

\n
\n
\"We<\/img>
\n These are white latex balloons 16 weeks after we composted them. Credit: Jesse Benjamin, Author provided
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Were the balloons still stretchy? We tested this in the University of Tasmania engineering lab to determine tensile (resistence) strength. We found that in water tanks, the balloons became less stretchy, losing around 75% of their tensile strength. But if they had been composted, balloons retained their stretchiness.
\nWere the balloons still composed of the same things they started with? We tested this by taking spectral measurements of the balloons’ surface. The balloons showed signs they were exposed to ultra violet light in the water tanks, but not in the compost. This means their chemical composition changed in water, but only slightly.
\nFinally, and most importantly, did the balloons lose mass?
\nAfter 16 weeks, the balloons were still recognizably balloons, though they behaved a little differently in compost, water and saltwater. Some balloons lost 1\u20132% mass, and some balloons in freshwater gained mass, likely due to osmotic absorption of water.
\nWhat can we do?<\/b>
\nIt’s clear latex balloons don’t meaningfully degrade in 16 weeks and will continue to pose a threat to wildlife. So what can we do as consumers? We offer these tips:<\/p>\n