{"id":581902,"date":"2023-07-08T13:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-07-08T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/how-john-roberts-exhibited-his-power-in-the-supreme-courts-biggest-decisions\/"},"modified":"2023-07-08T13:00:00","modified_gmt":"2023-07-08T10:00:00","slug":"how-john-roberts-exhibited-his-power-in-the-supreme-courts-biggest-decisions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/how-john-roberts-exhibited-his-power-in-the-supreme-courts-biggest-decisions\/","title":{"rendered":"#How John Roberts exhibited his power in the Supreme Court\u2019s biggest decisions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/05\/646e0f7449c930.98169521-e1685482340103.jpeg?w=900\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The Supreme Court is still the John Roberts court, a fact underscored by the chief justice\u2019s influence on the biggest cases of the most recent term.<\/p>\n<p>Roberts at times allowed the court\u2019s 6-3 conservative majority to flex its muscle in gutting affirmative action, blocking student debt relief and allowing a website designer to refuse to make same-sex wedding websites.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"ad-unit ad-unit--mr1_ab\"><\/aside>\n<p>In several other major cases, Roberts kept the court from embracing sweeping legal positions, breaking with some of his most conservative colleagues to strike down Alabama\u2019s Republican-drawn congressional map and reject a fringe legal theory that would have handed near-total authority to state legislatures in setting federal election rules.<\/p>\n<p>Court watchers said Roberts\u2019s alignment is not a reflection of his role as chief justice, and instead shows his prominence in the ideological middle of the high court.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t really think he has control over his colleagues,\u201d said Adam Unikowsky, a former law clerk to the late Justice Antonin Scalia who practices before the court.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI think he\u2019s close to the middle of the court, and in most cases, the middle of the court will be in the majority, and that\u2019s true in almost every case this year,\u201d Unikowsky added. \u201cBut I don\u2019t really feel like he exercised much influence on his colleagues beyond the vote that he has.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Roberts was in the majority 95 percent of the time this term, according to\u00a0<a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/empiricalscotus.com\/2023\/06\/30\/another-one-bites-2022\/\">Empirical SCOTUS<\/a>. Only Justice Brett Kavanaugh, another conservative seen as part of the court\u2019s ideological middle, surpassed the chief justice, voting with the majority 96 percent of the time.<\/p>\n<p>In multiple major decisions, the duo showed a willingness to not go as far as their conservative colleagues. Kavanaugh and Roberts voted together 95 percent of the time this term, tying as the most agreeable pair of justices, the group found.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"ad-unit ad-unit--mr2_ab\"><\/aside>\n<p>And when the duo broke at times with the other conservatives, it gave the three liberals the majority.<\/p>\n<p>In the dispute over Alabama\u2019s Republican-drawn congressional map, a three-judge district court panel struck it down as a racial gerrymander that likely violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, ordering the state to draw new lines that included a second majority-Black district.<\/p>\n<p>Expectations ran high that the Supreme Court would reverse that decision, and by doing so, narrow the Voting Rights Act.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"ad-unit ad-unit--mr3_ab\"><\/aside>\n<p>But Roberts and Kavanaugh \u2014\u00a0over the dissents of their four more conservative colleagues\u00a0\u2014 ultimately sided with liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson to strike down the Republican-drawn map.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThose are important counterpoints to the cases at the end, affirmative action, the website with same-sex couples and student loans,\u201d said Unikowsky. \u201cSo it\u2019s not all one-sided. I mean, obviously, the latter three cases are very significant. But you can see a court willing to go both ways.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Roberts wrote for the 5-4 majority that \u201cthe heart of these cases is not about the law as it exists. It is about Alabama\u2019s attempt to remake our \u00a72 jurisprudence anew,\u201d\u00a0referring to Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"ad-unit ad-unit--mr4_ab\"><\/aside>\n<p>Steven Schwinn, a law professor at the University of Illinois Chicago who closely follows the court, said \u201cthe litigants were way overshooting\u201d in the case.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor the court to reject or partially reject their claims, I don\u2019t see as moderation,\u201d he said. \u201cI just see it as normal in the Alabama case.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Roberts\u2019s next majority opinion also rejected a sweeping Republican-promoted election law theory.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"ad-unit ad-unit--mr5_ab\"><\/aside>\n<p>Joined by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, another Trump <a href=\"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/category\/download-scripts-themes-apps\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"9\" title=\"Download Scripts &amp; Themes &amp; Apps\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">app<\/a>ointee, Roberts, Kavanaugh and the three liberal justices rejected the maximalist argument known as the \u201cindependent state legislature\u201d theory, declining to hand near-total authority to state legislatures in drawing congressional maps and setting federal election rules.<\/p>\n<p>Roberts\u2019s opinion preserved the role of state courts in adjudicating federal election rules. But he also caveated, writing that \u201cstate courts do not have free rein.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn the independent state legislature case, I actually don\u2019t even really see it as normal,\u201d said Schwinn. \u201cThe court did reject the most aggressive form of the independent state legislature theory, but it still left a possibility that the independent state legislature theory could have an impact on our politics and elections.\u201d<\/p>\n<aside class=\"ad-unit ad-unit--mr6_ab\"><\/aside>\n<p>In the final days of the term, the conservative majority threw away any remaining doubts as to their strength, handing down three major decisions that fell along ideological lines.<\/p>\n<p>The court ruled that a website designer had a free speech right to refuse to design same-sex wedding websites, affirmative action in college admissions was unconstitutional and the Biden administration could not implement its student debt relief plan.<\/p>\n<p>Roberts authored the majority opinion in the latter two cases, stopping debt relief for more than 40 million student borrowers and effectively putting the nail in the coffin for race-conscious admissions policies.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"ad-unit ad-unit--mr7_ab\"><\/aside>\n<p>The chief\u2019s decision to write the affirmative action decision, which struck down admissions policies at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina, came with little surprise because Roberts has lamented racial classifications for years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,\u201d Roberts wrote in a 2007 case involving a public school district\u2019s use of race to assign students to schools.<\/p>\n<p>Schwinn called the Harvard decision an \u201cultimate victory\u201d for the chief justice.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI see this ruling as a capstone to the effort to read the Equal Protection Clause as a colorblind command in the Constitution,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>Copyright 2023 Nexstar <a href=\"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/category\/social-mediaa\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"1\" title=\"Social Media\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Media<\/a> Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff6600;\">If you liked the article, do not forget to share it with your friends. Follow us on\u00a0<span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><a style=\"color: #ff0000;\" href=\"https:\/\/news.google.com\/publications\/CAAqBwgKMLG0nwswvr63Aw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Google News<\/a><\/span>\u00a0too, click on the star and choose us from your favorites.<\/span><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">For forums sites go to <span style=\"color: #ff9900;\"><a style=\"color: #ff9900;\" href=\"https:\/\/forum.buradabiliyorum.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Forum.BuradaBiliyorum.Com<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>If you want to read more <a href=\"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/category\/news\/\" data-internallinksmanager029f6b8e52c=\"2\" title=\"News\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">News<\/a> articles, you can visit our <span style=\"color: #ff9900;\"><a style=\"color: #ff9900;\" href=\"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/news\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">News category.<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"color: black;\"><a style=\"color: #ff9900;\" href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/regulation\/court-battles\/4085653-how-john-roberts-exhibited-his-power-in-the-supreme-courts-biggest-decisions\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court is still the John Roberts court, a fact underscored by the chief justice\u2019s influence on the biggest cases of the most recent term. Roberts at times allowed the court\u2019s 6-3 conservative majority to flex its muscle in gutting affirmative action, blocking student debt relief and allowing a website designer to refuse to&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":581903,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thehill.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2023\/05\/646e0f7449c930.98169521-e1685482340103.jpeg?w=1280","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[70897],"tags":[134448,74776,134417,71807,134343,70363,134418,134353,134447,87287,134345,71404],"class_list":["post-581902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-abortion-rights","tag-affirmative-action","tag-blog-briefing-room","tag-brett-kavanaugh","tag-campaign","tag-civil-rights","tag-congress-blog","tag-court-battles","tag-energy-and-environment","tag-john-roberts","tag-state-watch","tag-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/581902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=581902"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/581902\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/581903"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=581902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=581902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=581902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}