{"id":646540,"date":"2024-12-11T17:20:31","date_gmt":"2024-12-11T14:20:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/religious-people-are-not-more-generous-than-atheists-with-one-exception\/"},"modified":"2024-12-11T17:20:31","modified_gmt":"2024-12-11T14:20:31","slug":"religious-people-are-not-more-generous-than-atheists-with-one-exception","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/religious-people-are-not-more-generous-than-atheists-with-one-exception\/","title":{"rendered":"#Religious people are not more generous than atheists\u2014with one exception"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n \"Religious
\n Hajdi Moche and Nathalie Hallin. Credit: Link\u00f6ping University
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Religious believers are no more generous than atheists\u2014at least as long as they don’t know what the recipient believes in. Finding this out increases generosity significantly, mainly because people give more to those who share their religion. This is the conclusion of a study carried out in Sweden, the U.S., Egypt and Lebanon by researchers at Link\u00f6ping University, Sweden.<\/p>\n

Nathalie Hallin is an atheist. Her colleague Hajdi Moche is a Christian. They both have a postdoc position at the Department of Behavioral Science<\/a>s and Learning at Link\u00f6ping. Together, they wanted to find out if a religious belief makes a person more generous, which research has so far disagreed on and they themselves have discussed a lot.<\/p>\n

To find the answer, together with their co-authors Gerhard Andersson and Daniel, they have carried out three studies: one in Sweden, one in the U.S. and a combined one in Egypt and Lebanon. The results are published<\/a> in the journal Judgment and Decision Making<\/i>.<\/p>\n

The Swedish study included 398 people. These were given the task of distributing fictitious money between themselves and three hypothetical recipients over six rounds. They then answered questions about religious affiliation and political beliefs, but also about things such as favorite hobby, favorite film genre and the like.<\/p>\n

In all rounds, participants were told something about the recipients, for example, about hobbies, political conviction or which films they liked. In one of the rounds, information about religion was given. The researchers then examined how the participants’ generosity was affected by what they were told.<\/p>\n

In most of the rounds, it turned out that religious and non-religious people gave away the same amount of money. But when they learned about the recipients’ religion, there was a clear difference. Religious believers became more generous than the non-religious participants. This was shown mainly by them giving more money to those of the same faith as themselves. But atheists also proved to favor their own group.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n \"Religious
\n Amount given in the religion round for study 1, as a function of religious affiliation of the participant and recipient in Dictator Game<\/a>. Credit: Judgment and Decision Making<\/i> (2024). DOI: 10.1017\/jdm.2024.14
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n

“I was actually surprised because the only thing that unites atheists is that you don’t believe in a god,” says Hallin.<\/p>\n

Follow-up studies with just over 700 people in the U.S. and about 600 in Egypt and Lebanon gave the same results: Religion was the factor that had the greatest impact on generosity, and the participants favored the group that had the same faith as themselves.<\/p>\n

In all three studies, Hallin and Moche also investigated whether generosity differed between different religions and outlooks on life. The participants were divided into three groups: Christians, Muslims and atheists.<\/p>\n

The analysis showed that Muslims in the U.S. were more generous to their own kind than Christians and atheists were. There were also signs of this in Sweden, but the number of Muslims who participated was too low to say for sure. In Lebanon and Egypt, however, there was no difference in how much Christians and Muslims gave. Whether this is due to different cultural norms, the position of Muslims in American society or something else is uncertain. In Egypt and Lebanon there were too few atheists in the survey to make a comparison.<\/p>\n

As researchers, Hallin and Moche find it interesting that the relationship to religion has such a strong impact on generosity and group feeling but are careful not to evaluate this. According to them, favoring one’s own can be considered unfair, but can, for example, be seen as better than not being generous at all.<\/p>\n

“At the same time, you can be generous in different ways. You can be generous with time, with love or with care. So whether there is anything in religion that says you should be generous with money in particular is something to think about anyway,” says Moche.<\/p>\n

\n

More information:<\/strong>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tNathalie Hallin et al, Who is generous and to whom? Generosity among Christians, Muslims, and atheists in the USA, Sweden, Egypt, and Lebanon, Judgment and Decision Making<\/i> (2024). DOI: 10.1017\/jdm.2024.14<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tProvided by
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSwedish Research Council
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/svg>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n

\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCitation<\/strong>:
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tReligious people are not more generous than atheists\u2014with one exception (2024, December 11)
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tretrieved 11 December 2024
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tfrom https:\/\/phys.org\/news<\/a>\/2024-12-religious-people-generous-atheists-exception.html\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/p>\n

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n