{"id":647429,"date":"2024-12-22T17:30:27","date_gmt":"2024-12-22T14:30:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/google-pushes-back-against-dojs-interventionist-remedies-in-antitrust-case\/"},"modified":"2024-12-22T17:30:27","modified_gmt":"2024-12-22T14:30:27","slug":"google-pushes-back-against-dojs-interventionist-remedies-in-antitrust-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/google-pushes-back-against-dojs-interventionist-remedies-in-antitrust-case\/","title":{"rendered":"#Google pushes back against DOJ\u2019s \u2018interventionist\u2019 remedies in antitrust case"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Google has offered up its own proposal in a recent antitrust case that saw the US Department of Justice argue that Google must sell its Chrome browser.<\/p>\n

US District Court Judge Amit Mehta ruled in August that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search, with the DOJ then proposing a number of remedies, including the sale of Chrome, the spinoff of its Android operating system, and a prohibition on entering into exclusionary search agreements with browser and phone companies.<\/p>\n

Google filed an alternativee proposal<\/a> Friday, with the company\u2019s vice president of regulatory affairs Lee-Anne Mullholland claiming in a blog post<\/a> that the DOJ\u2019s proposal reflects an \u201cinterventionist agenda\u201d that \u201cgoes far beyond what the Court\u2019s decision is actually about.\u201d<\/p>\n

Mulholland added that the \u201cbigger problem is that DOJ\u2019s proposal would harm American consumers and undermine America\u2019s global technology<\/a> leadership at a critical juncture \u2014 such as by requiring us to share people\u2019s private search queries with foreign and domestic rivals, and restricting our ability to innovate and improve our products.\u201d<\/p>\n

As an alternative, Google proposes that it still be allowed to make search deals with companies like App<\/a>le and Mozilla, but they should have the option to set different defaults on different platforms (for example, iPhone vs. iPad) and in different browsing modes.<\/p>\n

The company also proposes that Android device manufacturers could have more flexibility pre-loading multiple search engines, as well as with pre-loading Google apps without Google Search or Chrome.<\/p>\n

Judge Mehta is expected to rule on remedies next year, with a hearing scheduled for April. Mulholland said Google isn\u2019t just planning to negotiate over remedies \u2014 it also plans to appeal Mehta\u2019s August ruling against the company. But she wrote, \u201cBefore we file our appeal, the legal process requires that the parties outline what remedies would best respond to the Court\u2019s decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

If you liked the article, do not forget to share it with your friends. Follow us on\u00a0Google News<\/a><\/span>\u00a0too, click on the star and choose us from your favorites.<\/span><\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\n

If you want to read more like this article, you can visit our Technology<\/a><\/span> category.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Source<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Google has offered up its own proposal in a recent antitrust case that saw the US Department of Justice argue that Google must sell its Chrome browser. US District Court Judge Amit Mehta ruled in August that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search, with the DOJ then proposing a number…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":647430,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/techcrunch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/GettyImages-2186206744.jpg?w=1024","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[143888,26293,151537,151659],"class_list":["post-647429","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology","tag-antitrust","tag-google","tag-government-policy","tag-us-department-of-justice"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647429","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=647429"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/647429\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/647430"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=647429"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=647429"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=647429"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}