{"id":88082,"date":"2020-10-13T03:06:20","date_gmt":"2020-10-13T00:06:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/en.buradabiliyorum.com\/democrats-dont-dare-say-why-they-oppose-judge-barrett-so-they-lie-instead\/"},"modified":"2020-10-13T03:06:20","modified_gmt":"2020-10-13T00:06:20","slug":"democrats-dont-dare-say-why-they-oppose-judge-barrett-so-they-lie-instead","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/democrats-dont-dare-say-why-they-oppose-judge-barrett-so-they-lie-instead\/","title":{"rendered":"#Democrats don\u2019t dare say why they oppose Judge Barrett, so they lie instead"},"content":{"rendered":"

“#Democrats don\u2019t dare say why they oppose Judge Barrett, so they lie instead<\/strong>”
\n<\/p>\n

\n Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee devoted their opening statements on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to repeating a shameless lie. Why can\u2019t they share their real reasons for opposing her?<\/p>\n

The Democrats, one after another, claimed that confirming Barrett would result in ObamaCare being overturned when the court takes it up Nov. 10, with Americans dying as a result.<\/p>\n

It\u2019s plainly false: Several conservative justices clearly don\u2019t buy the arguments made for striking down the law in this case. And Barrett, based on her overall philosophy, is likely to agree with them.<\/p>\n

Plus, Republicans are universally in favor of keeping protections for those with pre-existing conditions and have vowed to put it into law if ObamaCare does get overturned.<\/p>\n

Yet Sen. Corey \u201cSpartacus\u201d Booker (D-NJ) still insisted Republicans are out \u201cto ensure tens of millions of people lose their health care.\u201d Veep-nominee Sen. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) claimed that \u201c135 million Americans with pre-existing conditions\u201d would lose their health care. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.): \u201cHealth-care coverage for millions of Americans is at stake.\u201d Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hi.): The lives of Americans with pre-existing conditions \u201care what\u2019s at stake.\u201d<\/p>\n

All of it shameless posturing, utterly contrary to fact \u2014 and they all know it.<\/p>\n

Harris also called it \u201creckless\u201d to hold the hearing during the pandemic, as if Congress weren\u2019t holding many hearings these days. And Chairman Lindsey Graham pointed out at the start that the committee was following Centers for Disease Control guidelines.<\/p>\n

It was all cover for the gripe Democrats don\u2019t dare make publicly: that Barrett won\u2019t be an activist justice seeking to read liberals\u2019 wish lists into the Constitution. As she said Monday, our \u201ccourts are not designed to solve every problem or right every wrong in our public life. The policy decisions and value judgments of government must be made by the political branches elected by and accountable to the people.\u201d<\/p>\n

And that\u2019s not good enough for Democrats who know how unpopular so many of their political dreams are.\n <\/p><\/div>\n

\n

For forums sites go to Forum.BuradaBiliyorum.Com<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\n

If you want to read more News<\/a> articles, you can visit our News category.<\/a><\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Source<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“#Democrats don\u2019t dare say why they oppose Judge Barrett, so they lie instead” Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee devoted their opening statements on the Supreme Court nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to repeating a shameless lie. Why can\u2019t they share their real reasons for opposing her? The Democrats, one after another, claimed that…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":88083,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/nypost.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2020\/10\/MEGA707259_ACB.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=1200","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[70897],"tags":[75405,71982,43,75580,71404],"class_list":["post-88082","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-news","tag-10-12-20","tag-amy-coney-barrett","tag-editorial","tag-hearings","tag-supreme-court"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88082","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88082"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88082\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/88083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88082"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88082"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/buradabiliyorum.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88082"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}